Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
TerrorScribeThe Rite (2010)
#1
The Rite (2010)


Directed by: Mikael Håfström
Written by: Michael Petroni (inspired by the book by Matt Baglio)
Starring: Colin O'Donoghue, Anthony Hopkins, Alice Braga, Rutger Hauer, Ciarán Hinds
Running time: 112 minutes
Rating: PG-13

Faith.

What do you believe? Why do you believe it? In the case of religion, we have faith that there is a purpose for our lives, that there is a meaning to it all and ultimately, that there is reward or consequences.

In short, we hope.

Hope is an emotional Schrödinger's Cat that sits in its box until we open it and find the true gift: proof. Some people, however, are simply content to wait and wonder, fearing the knowledge that proof might bring.

The latest effort from filmmaker Mikael Håfström ("1408") introduces us to Michael Kovak (Colin O'Donoghue), the son of a mortician who is being prepped to continue this family business. That is not the life he wants for himself, so as a means of "escape", he joins the priesthood. He figures he can get a four-year education and then decide against taking his vows at the end of it. It seems like a good plan and on the eve of his ordination, he passes his resignation along to the Father Superior. That's when he finds out that if he chooses to quit, his education will come due to the tune of about $100,000 in student loans. He's handed another option, though - attend a month-long course in exorcism in Rome. Father Superior sees promise in him and he thinks that training as an exorcist might change his skeptical mind. While in Rome, he meets Angeline (Alice Braga), a reporter doing a story on the course. She seems drawn to his skepticism, but this same cynicism also draws the attention of his instructor, who sends him to an experienced exorcist, Father Trevant (Anthony Hopkins) for some real-world experience with spiritual warfare.

"The Rite", like most January fare, is not a great movie. It is, however, a much better vehicle for Hopkins than his last foray in to January horror ("The Wolfman"). In the hands of an experienced and capable horror director in Håfström, we get more than just gloss and empty shadows. Given that we are dealing with the dubious world of spirits and exorcisms, Håfström gives the movie a feeling that straddles the mundane and the fantastic. He gets plenty of help from his cast. O'Donoghue is solid as the unbelieving young aspirant. Braga also does well as the inquiring journalist and non-love interest.

And now, here's the part where I'm going to upset a bunch of people.
I don't think I liked Anthony Hopkins in this.

Sad but true. Even though he did his usually very good job of playing the mentor, there were just some parts of the film where I felt like some of his direction was just, "For this part, just give me some Hannibal Lector." At that point, I stopped seeing Father Trevant and started seeing Hopkins aping old roles and trotting them out again like a show pony. Could just be me, but that's the impression I took away from it.

I liked the movie as a whole. They did a good job of creating likable, interesting and believable characters; though there were times I thought they took the "skeptic" act a bit too far. They may also have borrowed just a little too much from "The Exorcist" playbook (old priest, young priest, crisis of faith, etc...). To a casual moviegoer, it probably won't be a big deal, but to a genre fan, the tropes stick out like an angry pimple. What bothered me most though was how many times I caught the film shamelessly trying to manipulate me. While every movie does this - that's how we suspend our disbelief, after all - this one was way too obvious and ham-handed about it.

"The Rite" is a perfectly serviceable horror/thriller doing its darnedest to nose its way above other mid-winter fare. It's certainly not a bad way to spend a Friday night.

At least, one can hope...
The Jaundiced Eye
Reply
#2
Ach. This one ain't high on my list. Considering the stuff you mention it sounds like a pretty "complacent" one to me. 1408 was good alright, but not quite good enough to make this one sound promising to me just on the virtues of its director.
“The Fright Night remake is a film which taps into the audience’s deepest rooted fears, such as those of vampires throwing motorcycles at them. I dread the thought of a vampire throwing a refrigerator or a deskjet printer or... I’d better stop before I give myself nightmares”
Reply
#3
I have to say, he was probably a saving grace for the film. I wager it would have been a lot worse without a veteran horror director. Though I really could have done without a couple of the stupid jumpscares: you see them coming a mile away.
The Jaundiced Eye
Reply
#4
I had my doubts about this movie, but having watched it i really enjoyed it..its worth a look
Reply
#5
I didn't think this was a bad film at all. It just left something lacking for me. Malice or the sense of real threat perhaps. I just wasn't moved by the possessions sufficiently to buy into them. Still perfectly watchable nonetheless.
Reply
#6
I don't know. I think the reason why I haven't watched it yet is because it looks really campy and very cliche. It seems like they are trying to pass it off as a throw-back to classic demonic possession movies but it's coming off as a knock-off.
"The conquest of fear lies in the moment of its acceptance. And understanding what scares us most is that which is most familiar, most common place"
- Chris Carter

Please check out my blog: The Paradise of Horror
Reply
#7
FreddysFingers Wrote:I don't know. I think the reason why I haven't watched it yet is because it looks really campy and very cliche. It seems like they are trying to pass it off as a throw-back to classic demonic possession movies but it's coming off as a knock-off.

After seeing it I would have to agree. Its certainly not like you can't sit through it or see some merit in it. It just brings nothing new to the table and isn't engaging enough for you to look past that.
Reply
#8
FreddysFingers Wrote:I don't know. I think the reason why I haven't watched it yet is because it looks really campy and very cliche. It seems like they are trying to pass it off as a throw-back to classic demonic possession movies but it's coming off as a knock-off.

I wouldn't exactly call it campy but I think Hopkins gets REALLY close to it, and I think that's a little sad.
The Jaundiced Eye
Reply
#9
I think that's enough to make me stay away from it.
"The conquest of fear lies in the moment of its acceptance. And understanding what scares us most is that which is most familiar, most common place"
- Chris Carter

Please check out my blog: The Paradise of Horror
Reply


Possibly Related Threads…
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  The Last Exorcism (2010) TerrorScribe 14 6,557 04-27-2012, 05:49 PM
Last Post: Chainsaw Brutality
  My Soul To Take (2010) TerrorScribe 3 2,544 04-27-2012, 05:25 PM
Last Post: Chainsaw Brutality
  Buried (2010) TerrorScribe 9 4,586 08-09-2011, 05:17 PM
Last Post: CarolinePar
  The Wolfman (2010) TerrorScribe 16 7,079 07-08-2011, 03:03 AM
Last Post: Chainsaw Brutality
  Hatchet 2 (2010) TerrorScribe 18 7,536 06-27-2011, 05:08 PM
Last Post: FreddysFingers
  A Serbian Film (2010) TerrorScribe 2 2,251 01-04-2011, 03:10 PM
Last Post: TerrorScribe
  The Super (2010) TerrorScribe 1 2,083 11-25-2010, 02:28 AM
Last Post: Friday The 13th
  Altitude (2010) TerrorScribe 1 2,043 11-17-2010, 12:33 AM
Last Post: FreddysFingers
  Walking Distance (2010) TerrorScribe 4 2,937 11-17-2010, 12:32 AM
Last Post: FreddysFingers
  Shutter Island (2010) TerrorScribe 10 5,093 11-14-2010, 09:01 AM
Last Post: NicoleMayCanaday

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)