10-17-2010, 01:30 PM
You mean the one from the 50s, the one from the 80s or the remake of the one from the 80s? I haven't seen the remake, but the other two were allright in my book.
The one from the 50s was admittedly slow paced, but kept a good atmosphere going for the most part and had some real nice acting. To some the scenes with the demon itself shouldn't have been there but I thought they added to the horror of the whole thing.
The one from the 80s, despite being chock full of sleazy cheeze and a few sadly underdeveloped characters, had a good atmosphere and was all in all a nice attempt to duplicate the kind of "mounting suspense" that films like The Evil Dead create
.
The one from the 50s was admittedly slow paced, but kept a good atmosphere going for the most part and had some real nice acting. To some the scenes with the demon itself shouldn't have been there but I thought they added to the horror of the whole thing.
The one from the 80s, despite being chock full of sleazy cheeze and a few sadly underdeveloped characters, had a good atmosphere and was all in all a nice attempt to duplicate the kind of "mounting suspense" that films like The Evil Dead create
.
âThe Fright Night remake is a film which taps into the audienceâs deepest rooted fears, such as those of vampires throwing motorcycles at them. I dread the thought of a vampire throwing a refrigerator or a deskjet printer or... Iâd better stop before I give myself nightmaresâ


![[-]](http://talkhorror.com/boards/themes/dim/collapse.png)