10-28-2010, 07:30 PM
Remakes takes it pretty easily. M Night is unfairly bashed although he has had flops. Sequels can be great; look at Psycho II, that was an amazingly hard to follow up film and yet it worked awesomely. 3D can be shit, but not necessarily. Like I've said, 3D is just a visual element, and really has no bearing on plot unless the director lets it.
Remakes on the other hand are a different beast. They can be good, but the problem is that usually they aren't. They're usually just done to make money, make it off of films that can't really be improved and moreover don't need to be improved.
Remakes on the other hand are a different beast. They can be good, but the problem is that usually they aren't. They're usually just done to make money, make it off of films that can't really be improved and moreover don't need to be improved.
âThe Fright Night remake is a film which taps into the audienceâs deepest rooted fears, such as those of vampires throwing motorcycles at them. I dread the thought of a vampire throwing a refrigerator or a deskjet printer or... Iâd better stop before I give myself nightmaresâ


![[-]](http://talkhorror.com/boards/themes/dim/collapse.png)