Thread Rating:
  • 1 Vote(s) - 5 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
BGTNJeffIs franchise horror dead? Where does that leave us?
#16
BGTNJeff Wrote:Freddy-- Good point on the late '60s and '70s boom in Spiritism and supernatural drama. That's one of my favorite periods in horror history. However, we still had random slasher films coming out. Admittedly, they were mostly drive-in fare that didn't get the high profile or heavy distro of, say, THE SENTINEL or THE REINCARNATION OF PETER PROUD. But for every BEYOND THE DOOR, there were two BLACK CHRISTMASes.

Slashers began peaking in the late 70s (1978 and 1979) but were mostly indie movies or like you said, drive-in fare. Most studios wanted spiritual or supernatural movies but the indie genre found out about slashers and began making them in mass quantities. It was sort of an underground sub-genre that was gaining momentum fast. When the 80s started, slashers peaked and took over the studios.

Caftan King Wrote:[COLOR="Red"]They arent taking a chance because perhaps,,, they are afraid to know the feedbacks and the result of their gross revenue...lol.

But slasher flick producers and directors...for goodness sake!

What do you have to lose? If you don’t take the risk to create another movie with recognizable villains, you could lose many other things that will erode your abilities to be who you really are! So I am encouraging those producers to Try to make again!
[/COLOR]

See, that is exactly why there is so many cliche movies coming out like The Unborn or The Roommate and My Soul To Take because studios want to stick with the familiar. That's why Dougherty's Trick R Treat was shelved for so long because the studio was afraid of what audience might say about it, despite it's rave reviews. Studios will keep dishing out cliches because MODERN audiences want cliches. Horror has since become a haven for high schoolers, middle schoolers and casual people. They don't care about the scares, the story, the characters, the production... all they care about is blood, tits and a body count. Once moviegoers stop liking those things, things will change. Until then, kiss the old horror formulas goodbye.

Caftan King Wrote:But in every horror film death is always present since in every horror movie I seen somebody dies! lol

Of course, but in the Final Destination films death is the serial killer. It's not some loon, or a monster, or even a disease but rather death itself. Sure it may not be incarnate or shown as a grim reaper but he's there.
"The conquest of fear lies in the moment of its acceptance. And understanding what scares us most is that which is most familiar, most common place"
- Chris Carter

Please check out my blog: The Paradise of Horror
Reply


Messages In This Thread
Is franchise horror dead? Where does that leave us? - by FreddysFingers - 12-04-2010, 03:27 AM

Possibly Related Threads…
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  halloween franchise mrblue 26 13,108 05-07-2012, 07:22 PM
Last Post: mrblue
  ARTISTICALLY speaking, what do you think about franchise horror? Dr. Briggs 18 8,064 03-17-2011, 09:59 PM
Last Post: DragonBlues
  Return of the Living Dead 1-5 Trioxin149 10 5,950 07-11-2010, 12:10 PM
Last Post: FreddysFingers
  Saw Franchise mrblue 12 5,668 02-18-2010, 06:04 PM
Last Post: SAWfreak
  List of my top 10 horror movies (series wise) slasherbuddy73 27 7,885 02-27-2009, 10:02 PM
Last Post: Friday The 13th

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)