Is franchise horror dead? Where does that leave us?

[Caftan King]

[COLOR="DarkOrchid"]I think because there are the kind of movies people are not rushing to see on screen but nonetheless may make you glued once you catch it on TV while channel-surfing.

If you ask them why they got bored, they will particularly compare these old movies to the new films in terms of its visual and special effects. So it only means that they do care about lighting, the motifs or the mise-en scene.

Halloween and Rosemary's Baby are definitely old horror movies which means they don't have yet the qualities of advanced technology we use in film-making. And that results to crappy cinematography, crappy music, crappy lightnings, typical loud sounds followed by a "BOO!" event, ending that suggests a possible sequel and too predictable scenes.

If only each part were consistently having good special effects like horror movies nowadays, it may have fared better for the casual moviegoers. Still, for the undemanding viewer, those movies tour might well worth be considering.[/COLOR]