Thread Rating:
  • 1 Vote(s) - 5 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
BGTNJeffIs franchise horror dead? Where does that leave us?
#31
Caftan King Wrote:[COLOR="DarkOrchid"]Halloween and Rosemary's Baby are definitely old horror movies which means they don't have yet the qualities of advanced technology we use in film-making. And that results to crappy cinematography, crappy music, crappy lightnings, typical loud sounds followed by a "BOO!" event, ending that suggests a possible sequel and too predictable scenes.

If only each part were consistently having good special effects like horror movies nowadays, it may have fared better for the casual moviegoers. Still, for the undemanding viewer, those movies tour might well worth be considering.[/COLOR]

So what you're saying is that without special effects, a movie can't be scary? Surely you don't really think that.

Rosemary's Baby -- Crappy cinematography? Right, you mean the cinematography by William Fraker. The William Fraker who was nominated for an Oscar six times. Photographed the car chase in Bullitt. Yeah, that guy. What a hack. And forgot the Oscar Ruth Gordon won for her performance in that movie. Nope, not scary at all. What a giant piece of crap.

Halloween -- Crappy music? That is possibly the most recognizable and iconic horror soundtracks EVER. Last time I checked, Halloween was still the highest grossing independent film ever and why? Because it scares the living SHIT out of people. And how much blood did you really see? Practically none. You had two strangulations, a knife kill totally done in silhouette and a small cut on Jamie Lee Curtis' arm. Call in ILM!

Think of all the special effects in Psycho. Think of all the opticals and process shots in Turn of the Screw. Oh, wait, what? There aren't any? NO SHIT.

I guess that's because fear is psychological. It's an emotion. A special effect has nothing to do with it. If anything, too many special effects pull you out of the movie, make you aware of your surroundings instead of what you're watching and ruin the whole gods-damned thing.

Perfect example? Jan deBont's remake of "The Haunting." They spent millions of dollars on one staircase. Ridiculous. I don't know anyone who didn't laugh like a little girl on cocaine during that whole fucking movie. But when they go back and watch Robert Wise's original movie from the mid-sixties? Effective. Scary. They're impressed.

Again, because you can't punch "fear" into an imaging computer and come out with a scary movie. It doesn't happen.
The secret is behind the Blue Iris.
Reply


Messages In This Thread
Is franchise horror dead? Where does that leave us? - by BGTNJeff - 12-19-2010, 06:49 PM

Possibly Related Threads…
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  halloween franchise mrblue 26 14,449 05-07-2012, 07:22 PM
Last Post: mrblue
  ARTISTICALLY speaking, what do you think about franchise horror? Dr. Briggs 18 9,001 03-17-2011, 09:59 PM
Last Post: DragonBlues
  Return of the Living Dead 1-5 Trioxin149 10 6,554 07-11-2010, 12:10 PM
Last Post: FreddysFingers
  Saw Franchise mrblue 12 6,374 02-18-2010, 06:04 PM
Last Post: SAWfreak
  List of my top 10 horror movies (series wise) slasherbuddy73 27 9,217 02-27-2009, 10:02 PM
Last Post: Friday The 13th

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)