Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Evil Bong28 Days Later vrs 28 Weeks Later
#1
Which did you like better 28 Days Later or 28 Weeks Later?

I liked 28 Days Later better especially the beginning when the guy was walking the empty street of London --- AWESOME, could of done without the nude scene, I mean wasnt that guy embarrassed to show off his small willy? and the church scene as well was great. I still dont know what The End Is Extremly Fucking Nigh means. But I did think it went a little down hill after the met the soldiers, why is the military allways the bad guys? Overall the zombies? or infected? were way scarier than in 28 Weeks Later.

I did think the ending was better in 28 Weeks Later, Jerremy Renner was great. I like to see him in more horror movies.
Reply
#2
I liked them both but 28 Days wins out. The end of 28 days had you thinking there was hope.
The end of 28 Weeks, what the the hell is wrong with those Assholes letting those kids get away and infect the rest of humanity.
“The hottest places in hell are reserved for those who in times of great moral crises maintain their neutrality”

RON ZOMBIE:madfire:
Reply
#3
I agree. 28 Days all the way. I couldn't get into "stalker zombie dad."
[SIZE="3"]"I hunger for her love... I desire to see her suffer for eternity." ~ Radu Vladislas [/SIZE]

[Image: myspace_scary_icons_05.gif]

Kaptara!
Reply
#4
I have only seen them once and that was back when 28 Weeks was released. From what I remember, I liked them both but the reason why I choose 28 Days over 28 Weeks is simply because it had a story with character development. This is something that not many horror movies, let alone infection movies, have done properly. While I liked 28 Weeks, I felt like it was trying too hard to aim for the emotional side but I still liked it. I have a feeling if I were to watch them again, my feelings would change.
"The conquest of fear lies in the moment of its acceptance. And understanding what scares us most is that which is most familiar, most common place"
- Chris Carter

Please check out my blog: The Paradise of Horror
Reply
#5
I liked both of them... but prefer the first one more over the 2nd. Its been a while since ive seen either though.
Reply
#6
28 Weeks, easily.

28 Days is a boring snoozefest.
Reply
#7
Ooooo. Controversy. Looks we have one for Weeks and not Days.
"The conquest of fear lies in the moment of its acceptance. And understanding what scares us most is that which is most familiar, most common place"
- Chris Carter

Please check out my blog: The Paradise of Horror
Reply
#8
Days - 5
Weeks - 1
“The hottest places in hell are reserved for those who in times of great moral crises maintain their neutrality”

RON ZOMBIE:madfire:
Reply
#9
I watched both back to back with my daughter last week and we agreed that we'd enjoyed Days a bit more than Weeks. Both are a good watch but there is more of an ominous feeling to Days that we appreciated.
[SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
Reply
#10
I agree with Lollie. Days is better than weeks. I Found it hard to believe the mother was still alive, surely she would have been ripped to bits in the farm house ?Loco
Reply
#11
I think that Days also had a better soundtrack than Weeks because it felt more sad and ominous whereas Weeks just reused the same tune. I think Days really captured the look and feel of an utterly deserted world.
"The conquest of fear lies in the moment of its acceptance. And understanding what scares us most is that which is most familiar, most common place"
- Chris Carter

Please check out my blog: The Paradise of Horror
Reply
#12
Marklar Wrote:I agree with Lollie. Days is better than weeks. I Found it hard to believe the mother was still alive, surely she would have been ripped to bits in the farm house ?Loco

That was the only part I didnt like about 28 Weeks Later was when the guy ran out on his wife, not really a big deal just what a coward, but who knows what any of us would do if being chased by a large group of red eyed
Reply


Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)