03-02-2010, 11:04 PM
I don't consider III as part of the series. I KNOW what the reason was for making it a different plot but considering they went right back to the original plot without stopping afterwards makes me kind of disregard it. That's not to say it's bad; personally, I think III is my second favorite if you do put it alongside the rest just for how original it was and how disturbing the plot was.
I also think I like H20 and Resurrection more than the others here (haven't seen any of 'em in a while
), and say 6(66) is probably my least favorite out of all of them. Sure Mike is brutal in it, but "brutal" doesn't really become him; Michael is more "cold/dispassionate" usually, plus what the others say about the plot rings true to me (I was OK with the Thorn idea to start with, but the way they pulled it off really didn't work too well >.<).
I also think I like H20 and Resurrection more than the others here (haven't seen any of 'em in a while
), and say 6(66) is probably my least favorite out of all of them. Sure Mike is brutal in it, but "brutal" doesn't really become him; Michael is more "cold/dispassionate" usually, plus what the others say about the plot rings true to me (I was OK with the Thorn idea to start with, but the way they pulled it off really didn't work too well >.<).
âThe Fright Night remake is a film which taps into the audienceâs deepest rooted fears, such as those of vampires throwing motorcycles at them. I dread the thought of a vampire throwing a refrigerator or a deskjet printer or... Iâd better stop before I give myself nightmaresâ
![[-]](http://talkhorror.com/boards/themes/dim/collapse.png)